Intellectual Property

 

Health Law
Labor Law
Maritime Law
Mining Law
Offshore Corporations
Panamanian Corporate Law
Privatization
Commercial Law
Taxation
Litigation
Banking Law
Insurance
Immigration Law
Merger Acquisitions & Joint Venture
Privatization & Government Contracts
Real Estate & Property Law
Securities Regulation

Trust & Foundations

Commercial Transactions and
Contract Law
Banking & Finance Law
Communications Law
Immigration
Litigation on Commercial & Civil Matters
Intellectual Property :: Trademarks ::


OPPOSITION, CANCELLATION AND NULLITY ACTIONS AGAINST TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS

Oppositions, cancellations and nullities are special proceedings tried according to the grounds established in our Trademark Law No. 35 of May 10, 1996, before the Commercial-Civil Courts and not before the Panamanian Trademark Office.

Law No. 29 of February 1, 1996, which became effective on May 3, 1996, ordered the creation of the Commercial-Civil Courts, which have jurisdiction to hear the following cases:

Opposition actions against the registration of trademarks, service marks, trade names, collective marks, warranty marks, industrial designs or models or advertising slogans or signs;
Nullity and cancellation actions of industrial property rights;
Actions against the unlawful use of intellectual property rights;
Consumer’s protection

 

Counterclaims

Counterclaims shall be admissible for the following cases:

When the defendant opposes the registration of a trademark or trade name belonging to the plaintiff and used as basis for formalizing its opposition;
When the defendant requests the cancellation of the industrial property right, the registration of which is the basis for the plaintiff’s opposition.

 

Cancellation and Annulment of Registrations

Non-use of a trademark for five (5) consecutive years in the domestic market of the Republic of Panama or in the international market is a ground for requesting the cancellation of the registration.

The right to claim the nullity and/or cancellation of a mark will prescribe in ten (10) years following the date of issuance of the certificate of registration, except for those cases where the registration has been obtained in bad faith.

 

Requirements

Power of Attorney executed by the Plaintiff, attested by Notary Public and then legalized with the Seal of Apostille or by a Panamanian Consulate.

If the Plaintiff is a legal person or entity, a document issued by the proper governmental authorities (i.e. Register of Companies) in the country or state of origin of the Plaintiff, certifying the legal existence (Certificate of Good Standing) of the company. This document must be duly legalized by a Consul of Panama or by the Seal of the Apostille, if appropriate.

It is possible to file an Opposition or Cancellation action without the Power of Attorney and Certificate of legal existence of the Plaintiff by posting a bond of US$ 300.00 to guarantee that the documents will be duly filed within the two-months term, counted as from the date of admission of the Opposition or Cancellation complaint.

 


Proofs of the existence of prior rights to submit as evidence in Opposition or Cancellation/Nullity proceedings:

To demonstrate the existence of registered trademarks it is necessary to submit the following:

Certified copies of the registrations or certified copies of extracts of the trademarks issued directly by the corresponding Trademark Offices of each country, which have to be duly legalized with the Seal of Apostille or by a Panamanian Consulate. Certifications issued by the corresponding Trademark Offices in each country, duly legalized, are also valid. Simple copies or copies certified by a Notary or an Officer of the company are not valid, even if they have been legalized or are included in an Affidavit.

To demonstrate use of a trademark, it is recommendable to submit the following:

Original or copies of advertisements or publications made by the Plaintiff of the goods sold or services rendered under his earlier trademark, that have appeared in newspapers, catalogs or magazines of international circulation prior to the date of filing of the conflicting application/registration. The material should be as old as possible but there should also be evidence of the current use of the mark.
Original or copies of commercial invoices evidencing the sales made by the Plaintiff of the goods manufactured or sold or the services rendered under his earlier trademark, in any country of the world, prior to the date of filing of the conflicting application/registration. The material should be as old as possible but there should also be evidence of the current use of the mark. A Notary Public should certify the copies of invoices as true copies.
Samples, labels or packaging of the goods, if applicable.

The above described evidence material will be submitted before the Court during the evidentiary hearing and not with the complaint itself. However, the information about the existence of trademark registrations and prior use of the signs, which serves as basis for the Opposition or Cancellation action is necessary to prepare the corresponding complaint.

 

Overview of the Opposition, Cancellation and Nullity Proceedings

Filing of the complaint before the Commercial-Civil Court, on duty, against the conflicting application within the term of two (2) months, counted as of the date following the publication of the Official Bulletin;

The appointment of the Judge who will hear the case and the subsequent admission of the complaint;

Service of the complaint on the defendant party. The defendant shall be notified of the complaint in accordance with the following rules:

[1].When the defendant is domiciled within the court’s jurisdiction, the service shall be made in person;
[2].When the defendant is domiciled outside the court’s jurisdiction, but in the Republic of Panama, or abroad, service shall be made by way of letters rogatory, in accordance with the procedure established in the Judicial Code.


Answer to the complaint. It can be answered by the local attorney of the defendant or by a public defendant appointed by the Judge to represent him, if the defendant does not appear before the court, once it has been properly served;

Evidentiary hearing, where the parties will submit and adduce the evidence material to support their pleadings.

Once these steps have been duly completed, the Judge will proceed to review the pleadings and the evidence submitted by each party to render the first instance decision.

The loosing party may file an appeal recourse against the first instance decision. Once the appeal is granted, the commercial-civil court delivers the case to the Third Superior Court of Justice to fix the term, in order for the defendant to support the appeal. A term of ten days shall be set; the first five days for the appellant to support his appeal and the remaining five for the counterpart to oppose. The decisions rendered by the Third Superior Court of Justice are firm and finals.

 
HOME | THE FIRM | LAWYERS | FIELDS OF PRACTICE | CLIENTS | CONTACT US | LINKS
.
Benedetti & Benedetti 2004 :: Web Site produced by EM Technologies Corp.